Training activity information

Details

Assess radiation hazards and legislative implications for equipment or techniques new to the organisation and make recommendations

Type

Developmental training activity (DTA)

Evidence requirements

Evidence the activity has been undertaken by the trainee​.

Reflection on the activity at one or more time points after the event including learning from the activity and/or areas of the trainees practice for development.

An action plan to implement learning and/or to address skills or knowledge gaps identified.

Considerations

  • Ionising or non-ionising radiation applications
  • Guidance and legislation
  • Sources of information and reports on the new equipment/technique
  • Liaison with other professional groups and shared learning

Reflective practice guidance

The guidance below is provided to support reflection at different time points, providing you with questions to aid you to reflect for this training activity. They are provided for guidance and should not be considered as a mandatory checklist. Trainees should not be expected to provide answers to each of the guidance questions listed.

Before action

  • Consider the specific new equipment or technique that you will be assessing.
    • What constitutes a comprehensive hazard assessment and how can legislative implications be accurately determined?
    • What are the technical specifications and operational procedures for the new equipment or technique?
    • What are the potential radiation hazards associated with its use (e.g., direct beam, scatter radiation, induced activity)?
    • Which aspects of UK radiation safety legislation (IRR, IRMER, AORD) are most relevant to this new implementation?
    • What are the requirements for risk assessment, local rules, and staff training for such changes?
  • How will this activity enhance your ability to proactively assess radiation safety implications of new technologies and practices?
    • Will you develop your skills in applying relevant legislation to novel situations and formulating appropriate recommendations?
    • Will you gain a better understanding of the importance of involving radiation safety expertise early in the adoption of new equipment or techniques?
  • Gather detailed information about the new equipment or technique (e.g., manufacturer specifications, intended use).
    • Review relevant legislation, guidance, and best practices for similar equipment or techniques.
    • Consult with the manufacturer or other users of the equipment/technique if possible.
    • Discuss the assessment process and expected output with your training officer and potentially the Radiation Protection Adviser.
    • Do you feel confident in your ability to identify and assess potential radiation hazards?
    • Are you prepared to navigate the relevant legislation and formulate practical recommendations?

In action

  • Pay attention to how you are conducting the hazard assessment for the new equipment or technique.
    • What potential sources of radiation are you considering? What exposure pathways are relevant?
    • How are you evaluating the likelihood and magnitude of potential exposures? What legislative requirements are you considering (e.g., IRR, IRMER, specific guidance)?
    • What decisions are you making about the level of risk and the necessary control measures?
    • What principles of radiation protection (justification, optimisation, limitation) are guiding your assessment?
    • What aspects of hazard assessment and understanding legislative implications feel more familiar based on your previous training, and what requires more in-depth analysis and potentially seeking specialist advice?
  • How effective is your approach in identifying all relevant radiation hazards associated with the new equipment or technique?
    • Are you considering both routine operation and potential accidental scenarios?
    • What challenges are you encountering during the assessment? Is there sufficient information available about the new equipment or technique? Are the legislative requirements clear and directly applicable?
    • What are you learning about the process of introducing new technology or techniques safely into a radiation-based environment? What factors need careful consideration?
    • How does this assessment relate to your understanding of the responsibilities of the employer and other duty holders under radiation safety legislation to ensure the safety of staff, patients, and the public?
  • If you are unsure about how to assess a particular hazard or interpret a specific legislative requirement, are there experts or resources you could consult during your assessment?
    • What support or guidance might you need in the moment if you identify a potentially significant hazard that requires immediate attention?
    • Are you ensuring that your assessment is comprehensive and considers all relevant aspects of radiation safety and the applicable legislation?

On action

  • What new equipment or technique did you assess?
    • What were the potential radiation hazards associated with it?
    • Which pieces of radiation safety legislation were relevant to this new equipment or technique?
    • What risk assessments or other evaluations did you undertake?
    • What recommendations did you make regarding implementation, safety measures, or training?
  • What is involved in assessing radiation hazards associated with new technologies or procedures?
    • How do you identify and interpret the relevant legislative requirements in such situations?
    • What factors need to be considered when making recommendations to ensure safe implementation and use?
    • How does this process link to good governance of radiation safety within the organisation?
  • How will you approach the assessment of new technologies and techniques in the future?
    • What resources or information will you need to effectively conduct such assessments?
    • How will you ensure that your recommendations are clearly communicated and contribute to safe practice?

Beyond action

  • Have you reflected on the assessment of radiation hazards and legislative implications you conducted for the new equipment or technique?
    • Was the equipment/technique implemented, and if so, what were the outcomes?
    • Have you been involved in the assessment of other new equipment or techniques since this training activity?
    • How did your experience with this initial assessment inform your later work?
    • Has your understanding of the relevant legislation and hazard assessment processes evolved since this activity?
  • Has this training activity improved your ability to identify potential radiation hazards associated with new equipment or techniques?
    • Has it enhanced your understanding of how to apply relevant legislation (IRR, IRMER, AORD) to new scenarios?
    • Has the process of making recommendations strengthened your ability to contribute to decision-making processes regarding radiation safety?
  • Will the skills you developed in assessing radiation hazards and legislative implications be crucial in future roles involving the introduction of new technologies or procedures?
    • How might this experience contribute to your ability to provide expert advice on radiation safety for new developments within the organisation?
    • Will this experience support your ongoing professional development in keeping abreast of new technologies and their associated radiation safety considerations?

 

Relevant learning outcomes

# Outcome
# 1 Outcome

Apply the principles of good governance to radiation safety management.

# 4 Outcome

Formulate advice on compliance with aspects of legislation.

# 5 Outcome

Explain radiation safety issues and risks to a range of persons including the patient or their representative and staff from a variety of disciplines.