Training activity information

Details

Perform an assessment and prepare semen samples for treatment, to include:

  • Gradient centrifugation
  • Swim-up technique

Type

Entrustable training activity (ETA)

Evidence requirements

Evidence the activity has been undertaken by the trainee repeatedly, consistently, and effectively over time, in a range of situations. This may include occasions where the trainee has not successfully achieved the outcome of the activity themselves. For example, because it was not appropriate to undertake the task in the circumstances or the trainees recognised their own limitations and sought help or advice to ensure the activity reached an appropriate conclusion. ​

Reflection at multiple timepoints on the trainee learning journey for this activity.

Considerations

  • Method selection, including accuracy, limitations and validation
  • Retrograde samples, including production and processing
  • Witnessing requirements
  • Chain of custody
  • Standard operating procedures (SOPs)
  • Aseptic technique
  • Local and national health and safety policies
  • Record keeping and traceability
  • Cost implications
  • Uses of prepared sperm for further diagnostics

Reflective practice guidance

The guidance below is provided to support reflection at different time points, providing you with questions to aid you to reflect for this training activity. They are provided for guidance and should not be considered as a mandatory checklist. Trainees should not be expected to provide answers to each of the guidance questions listed.

Before action

  • You are expected to perform an assessment and prepare semen samples for treatment using techniques like gradient centrifugation and swim-up, adhering to national and international guidelines. This includes ensuring the prepared sample is suitable for clinical use.
    • Discuss with your training officer, the critical steps for each preparation technique, the expected quality of the processed sample (e.g., motility, concentration), and the sterile techniques required.
  • What do you already know about aseptic technique, cell separation principles (e.g., centrifugation), or handling viable cells for clinical application?
    • What difficulties might you face (e.g., contamination, poor recovery of motile sperm, incorrect media preparation)?
    • How will you ensure optimal sample quality for patient treatment?
    • When would you need to seek advice if a sample responds unexpectedly to preparation or if you have concerns about the final quality for patient use?
    • How do you feel about performing a procedure that directly impacts a patient’s treatment outcome?
  • What specific technical skills do you want to develop in meticulous sterile technique, precise handling of gradients, and optimising sperm recovery and quality for treatment?
    • What insights do you hope to gain into the factors influencing the success of sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technologies?
  • What improvements did you identify in previous reflections on cell preparation techniques or sterile laboratory work?
    • Do you need to review the specific SOPs for gradient centrifugation and swim-up, ensuring all media and equipment are sterile and suitable for clinical use?

In action

  • During the assessment and preparation, is there anything unexpected occurring?
    • Does the sample respond differently than anticipated to the preparation techniques (e.g., poor separation in gradient, low swim-up yield)?
    • How does this preparation compare with previous experiences using gradient centrifugation or swim-up techniques?
  • How do you react to any unexpected developments?
    • Do you need to adjust your technique or troubleshoot the process during the preparation?
    • How do you feel when performing the preparation, especially if it presents difficulties or does not yield the expected outcome?
  • What is the conclusion or outcome of the sample preparation?
    • Are you able to successfully prepare the semen sample for treatment using the required techniques?
    • What do you learn about optimising sperm preparation methods for varying sample qualities?

On action

  • Summarise the key points of your assessment and preparation of the semen sample for treatment, detailing the steps of gradient centrifugation and swim-up technique.
    • Consider specific events, actions, or interactions which felt important, including your own feelings during the experience.
    • Did the sample behave as expected during preparation, or were there any difficulties?
    • Include any ‘reflect-in-action’ moments where you adjusted your technique or troubleshoot the process due to the sample’s unexpected response (e.g., poor separation, low yield, high debris).
  • Identify what learning you can take from this experience.
    • What strengths did you demonstrate in handling the sample or executing the techniques precisely?
    • What skills and/or knowledge gaps were evident in optimising preparation methods for varying sample qualities?
    • Compare this experience against previous engagements with similar preparation techniques. Were any previously identified actions for development in sperm preparation achieved? Has your practice improved in preparing high-quality samples for treatment?
  • Identify any challenges you experienced (e.g., highly viscous samples, low sperm count samples, issues with gradient layers) and how you reacted to these.
    • Did this affect your ability to deal with the situation, and were you able to overcome the challenges?
    • What will you do differently next time you prepare a semen sample using these techniques?
    • Has anything changed in terms of what you would do if faced with a similar situation again?
    • Do you need to practise any aspect of sperm preparation further?

Beyond action

  • How has your skill and efficiency in performing gradient centrifugation and swim-up techniques for semen preparation evolved, especially when dealing with samples of varying quality and complexity?
  • What have you learned by revisiting previous sample preparations for treatment, especially regarding the correlation between preparation method and subsequent treatment success or challenges, and how has this informed your current practice?
  • How do you adapt your preparation techniques based on new research, equipment, or clinical feedback, ensuring continuous optimisation of patient samples and reflecting your commitment to best practice?
  • How does your mastery of these critical preparation techniques contribute to the overall success of assisted reproductive technologies and your evolving role as a key contributor to patient care?

Relevant learning outcomes

# Outcome
# 1 Outcome

Explain to a patient the process for providing sperm and semen sample for analysis, addressing patient concerns.

# 2 Outcome

Perform basic diagnostic andrology assessments according to national and international guidelines.

# 3 Outcome

Perform basic sperm preparation techniques.