Training activity information

Details

Communicate embryo quality to patients

Type

Entrustable training activity (ETA)

Evidence requirements

Evidence the activity has been undertaken by the trainee repeatedly, consistently, and effectively over time, in a range of situations. This may include occasions where the trainee has not successfully achieved the outcome of the activity themselves. For example, because it was not appropriate to undertake the task in the circumstances or the trainees recognised their own limitations and sought help or advice to ensure the activity reached an appropriate conclusion. ​

Reflection at multiple timepoints on the trainee learning journey for this activity.

Considerations

  • Patient centred care, support, and counselling
  • Effective communication of scientific information in an understandable manner to patients
  • Duty of candor
  • The effect of embryo quality on clinical outcomes
  • Managing patient expectations
  • Checking patient understanding
  • Breaking bad news

Reflective practice guidance

The guidance below is provided to support reflection at different time points, providing you with questions to aid you to reflect for this training activity. They are provided for guidance and should not be considered as a mandatory checklist. Trainees should not be expected to provide answers to each of the guidance questions listed.

Before action

What does success look like?

  • Identify what is expected of you in relation to communicating complex information like embryo quality to patients in a clear and understandable way.
  • Consider how the learning outcomes apply, specifically in relation to interpreting/reporting results, communicating effectively with patients, and practicing in accordance with regulatory and safety standards.
  • Discuss with your Training Officer to gain clarity of what is expected of you in relation to how to approach this communication effectively and empathetically.

What is your prior experience of this activity?

  • Think about what you already know about explaining scientific or medical information to non-experts.
  • Consider possible challenges you might face during the activity, such as managing patient anxiety or disappointment, using appropriate language, or addressing complex questions.
  • Recognise the scope of your own practice for this activity i.e. know when you will need to seek advice or help, and from whom. You will need to seek advice from your Training Officer when required, for example, if the patient raises complex ethical or clinical implications that exceed your routine role.
  • Acknowledge how you feel about embarking on this training activity, particularly regarding discussing sensitive results with patients.

What do you anticipate you will learn from the experience?

  • Consider the specific skills you want to develop, such as active listening, explaining complex concepts simply, or showing empathy.
  • Identify the specific insights you hope to gain into patient understanding and emotional responses related to embryology results.

What additional considerations do you need to make?

  • Consult actions identified following previous experiences of communication or reviewed feedback received.
  • Identify important information you need to consider before embarking on the activity, such as specific embryo grades, potential treatment outcomes, or available patient support resources.

In action

Is anything unexpected occurring?

  • Are you noticing anything surprising or different from what you anticipate whilst communicating the embryo grades and their clinical significance to the patient?
  • Are you encountering situations such as:
    • The patient reacts with intense unexpected distress or anger to the results, jeopardising the discussion flow.
    • The patient asks a complex ethical or legal question about the future use of cells that requires information outside the standard report script.
    • A language or comprehension barrier arises unexpectedly, challenging your ability to ensure informed communication.

How are you reacting to the unexpected development?

  • How is this impacting your actions? For example, are you responding to the situation appropriately? Are you adapting or changing your approach to communication technique or content delivery?
  • Consider the steps you are taking in the moment, such as immediately adjusting your tone and language to provide empathetic reassurance and slowing the pace of the discussion, or pausing the conversation to seek clarification on the patient’s understanding.
  • How are you feeling in that moment? For instance, are you finding it difficult to maintain composure while managing patient emotion? Is it affecting your confidence in explaining the implications for the treatment cycle?

What is the conclusion or outcome?

  • Identify how you are working within your scope of practice. For example, are you successfully explaining complex grades clearly and empathetically? Or are you needing support because the patient’s emotional state requires specialist counselling intervention that falls outside your communication role?
  • What are you learning as a result of the unexpected development? For example, are you mastering a more effective technique for gauging patient comprehension of sensitive results?

On action

What happened?

  • Begin by summarising the key steps you took when communicating the embryo quality (grades and implications) to the patient.
  • Consider specific events, actions, or interactions which felt important, such as how you explained complex grading terminology simply or how you managed the patient’s initial emotional reaction to the news.
  • Include any ‘reflect-in-action’ moments where you had to adapt to the situation as it unfolded, for instance, immediately adjusting your explanation when the patient appeared confused about the relationship between grade and success rate.
  • How did you feel during this experience, e.g., challenged by the need to manage patient anxiety or confident in your ability to communicate sensitively and clearly?

How has this experience contributed to your developing practice?

  • Identify what learning you can take from this experience regarding sensitive and effective patient communication. What strengths did you demonstrate, e.g., compassionate communication and clear articulation of next steps? What skills and/or knowledge gaps were evident, e.g., difficulty addressing complex ethical questions regarding embryo fate raised by the patient?
  • Compare this experience against previous engagement with similar activities – were any previously identified actions for development achieved? Has your practice improved in demonstrating effective and compassionate communication skills with patients?
  • Identify any challenges you experienced, such as the patient becoming highly distressed or asking questions outside your standard script, and how you reacted to this. This might include needing to seek advice or clarification on scope of practice regarding when to escalate emotional support or ethical queries to a senior team member, and how you reacted to this.

What will you take from the experience moving forward?

  • Identify the actions or ‘next steps’ you will now take to support the assimilation of what you have learnt, including from any feedback you have received, with regards to refining your communication approach for sensitive results.
  • What will you do differently next time you approach communicating embryo quality, for instance, by proactively preparing visual aids to explain the grading system?
  • Do you need to practise any aspect of the activity further, such as role-playing managing emotional patient responses or key learning outcomes related to communicating embryology results effectively?

Beyond action

Have you revisited the experiences?

  • How have your subsequent experiences of communicating sensitive clinical results, particularly unexpected failures, since completing this specific training activity led you to revisit your initial approach or decisions during that activity? For example, a subsequent interaction requiring highly empathetic communication due to severe patient distress forced you to re-evaluate the depth of empathy and clarity of language used during your first attempt at this training activity.
  • Considering what you understand about managing patient expectations, were the actions or considerations you identified after your initial reflection on this training activity sufficient? How have you since implemented or adapted improvements in your sensitive communication skills and structure for discussing negative outcomes based on further learning and experiences? For example, how you proactively developed structured response scripts for common difficult questions regarding viability or cycle failure and used them in practice.
  • Has discussing the impact of unclear explanations on patient autonomy changed how you now view your initial experience in this training activity? For example, how professional storytelling with a senior colleague about a difficult conversation regarding low-quality embryos refined your understanding of the critical nature of proactive patient support.

How have these experiences impacted upon current practice?

  • How has the learning from this initial training activity, in combination with subsequent sensitive communication and patient counselling experiences, contributed to your overall confidence and ability in explaining complex embryo results and managing patient expectation, particularly in preparing for assessments like DOPS or OCEs? For example, how your accumulated compassionate communication strategies and proficiency in discussing complex grading terminology now enables you to confidently discuss embryo development and quality with a patient and the implications for their treatment cycle during an OCE assessment.
  • How has reflecting back on this specific training activity, combined with everything you’ve learned since, shaped your current approach to patient interactions regarding embryology results? How does this evolved understanding help you identify when something is beyond your scope of practice or requires escalation? For example, how your evolved approach means you now routinely seek advice from the Training Officer immediately when patient distress or complex ethical queries regarding embryo disposal, recognising this falls outside routine result communication scope.
  • Looking holistically at your training journey, how has this initial patient communication experience, revisited with your current perspective, contributed to your development in meeting the learning outcomes related to communicating effectively with patients and the multidisciplinary team? For example, how this foundational experience has supported your development in practicing in accordance with regulatory and safety standards by ensuring clear communication.

Relevant learning outcomes

# Outcome
# 3 Outcome

Interpret and report embryology results.

# 4 Outcome

Communicate embryo grade and clinical decisions effectively with patients and the multidisciplinary team to enhance the overall patient experience.

# 5 Outcome

Practice in accordance with regulatory and safety standards, including keeping accurate records of the fates of embryos.